Sea Ice
- About
- Imprint
- Scenarios
- Arctic Marine Transportation by 2030
- Introduction
- Aim of this Study
- Key Factor Classification
- Definitions of Key Factors and Future Projections
- 1. Climate
- 2. Legal framework
- 3. Global Trade Dynamics – Global economic growth
- 4. Safety of other Routes
- 5. Socio-economic impact of global climate change
- 6. Oil Price
- 7. Major Arctic Shipping Disasters
- 8. Windows of Operation
- 9. Maritime Insurance Industry
- 10. Collaboration in resource extraction by China, Japan and Russia
- 11. Transit fees
- 12. Conflict between indigenous and commercial use
- 13. Arctic Enforcers
- 14. Energy sources for propulsion
- 15. New resource discovery
- 16. World Trade Patterns
- 17. Regulation in the Arctic
- Consistency matrix
- Scenarios
- Suggest Wild Cards
- Suggest Key Factors
- References
- Glossary
- Yakutat Community Energy Scenarios
- Introduction to Scenario-Management
- The Consistency and Robustness Analysis
- 1. Key Factors and their Future Projections
- 2. Assigning plausibility values to future projections
- 3. Projection Bundles
- 4. Assigning consistency values
- 5. Obtaining overall consistency values for the projection bundles
- 6. The combinatorial problem of the consistency analysis
- 7. The Robustness of a projection bundle
- Disruptive event analysis – Wild Cards
- ScenLab v1.7 Client download
- Arctic Marine Transportation by 2030
6. The combinatorial problem of the consistency analysis
As mentioned earlier it takes n/2 · (n − 1) evaluations per projection bundle to
evaluate all the pairs of future projections, where n is the number of key factors.
Now how many projection bundles are there for a number of n key factors?
Say each of the n key factors has m future projections. In this case there are
m^n possible projection bundles.
Example 5
Assume we have the key factors A, B and C with their respective future projections
A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C1 and C2, i.e. three key factors with two future
projections each. In this case we would expect that there are 23 = 8 projection
bundles, namely
• A1B1C1
• A1B1C2
• A1B2C1
• A1B2C2
• A2B1C1
• A2B1C2
• A2B2C1
• A2B2C2
Now, all these projection bundles need to be checked for their overall consistency
value, by performing n/2 · (n − 1) calculations per projection bundle. To
obtain the smallest number of calculations required to find all projection bundles
and their respective consistency values we multiply m^n · (n/2) · (n − 1), this is a
very fast growing number.
Example 6
For a project with 10 key factors and 2 future projections each the required overall
number of calculations amounts to 2^10 · 5 · 9 = 46, 080.
This is already a number which requires computational support.
For a project with 25 key factors and 3 future projections each this number
amounts to about 254 trillion calculations. This illustrates how fast the number
of calculations grows.
Even with an above average desktop computer a project with about 30 key
factors is not solvable (in a decent amount of time) with the classical algorithms
used for the consistency analysis.
- No comments yet.